SONGS FOR BERSIH: We're not gonna sit in silence

Here are some songs I want to dedicate to those who are going for Bersih 3.0, April 28 2012. Selamat Duduk Bantah! Cause sitting in and lyin' down are ways to take a stand!

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT US

MICHAEL JACKSON for BERSIH

(This video was the original version that was withdraw)
Tell me what has become of my rights
Am I invisible because you ignore me?
Your proclamation promised me free liberty, now
I'm tired of bein' the victim of shame

BONGKAR

IWAN FALS for BERSIH

Sabar sabar sabar dan tunggu
Itu jawaban yang kami terima
Ternyata kita mesti ke jalan
Robohkan setan yang berdiri mengangkang

HAVE YOU BEEN TO JAIL FOR JUSTICE?

ANNE FEENEY for BERSIH

Have you been to jail for justice? I want to shake your hand
Cause sitting in and lyin' down are ways to take a stand
Have you sung a song for freedom? or marched that picket line?
Have you been to jail for justice? Then you're a friend of mine

NOT READY TO MAKE NICE

DIXIE CHICKS for BERSIH

(This song is a response to the banning of their songs and the death threats received after the band openly criticised George W Bush)
I'm not ready to make nice
I'm not ready to back down
I'm still mad as hell and
I don't have time to go round and round and round

KINCHANG PENINDAS

AZMYL YUNOR for BERSIH

Bukan sebab engkau malas atau tak larat memintas
Cuma dada kau mengulas terfikir tentang hal menindas

SOMETHING INSIDE SO STRONG

LABI SIFFRE for BERSIH

(This song was written as an anti-apartheid anthem)
The higher you build your barriers
The taller I become
The farther you take my rights away
The faster I will run

SOLO LE PIDO A DIOS

(I ONLY ASK OF GOD)

MERCEDES SOSA for BERSIH

(This song is originally by Leon Gieco, written in response to military dictatorship in Argentina and also the exile of Mercedes Sosa, so that is why in this version, when Mercedes Sosa sang about being sent away, the crowd cheered)
I only ask of God that
I am not indifferent to injustice
For them not to slap my other cheek
once a claw has scratched my luck
(http://www.allthelyrics.com/forum/spanish-lyrics-translation/32506-mercedes-sosa-solo-le-pido-a-dios-translation.html)

CITY OF MUD

JEROME KUGAN for BERSIH

(Sabahan Jerome dedicated the song to our friend, human rights activist Toni Kasim)
They can take everything away
But we'll remain like two rivers that meet
Lovers and friends until the end

ONE NIGHT IN BEIJING

BOBBY CHEN for BERSIH

(This song is a tribute to the Tianamen Square revolution)
I have waited one thousand years why won’t the city gates open
I have waited one thousand years why hasn’t my beloved return

http://lyricstranslate.com

http://lyricstranslate.com

More lyrics (translated by me): http://lyricstranslate.com/en/one-night-beijing-one-night-beijing.html-0

YARA-E-DABESTANI E-MAN
(MY OLD GRADE SCHOOL FRIEND)

IRANIAN STUDENTS for BERSIH

(This song is popular with the Iranian student uprising)
It is your hand and mine that must tear these curtains
Who else but you and I can end this anguish?

DO YOU HEAR THE PEOPLE SING?

LES MISERABLES for BERSIH

Do you hear the people sing?
Singing a song of angry men?
It is the music of a people
Who will not be slaves again!

YOU'RE THE VOICE

JOHN FARNHAM for BERSIH

You're the voice, try and understand it
Make the noise and make it clear
We're not gonna sit in silence
We're not gonna live with fear

I WISH I KNEW HOW IT'D FEEL TO BE FREE

NINA SIMONE for BERSIH

I wish I knew how it would feel to be free
I wish I could break all the chains holding me

TEARS OF MALAYSIA

MALAYSIANS for BERSIH

You can really make a difference
A thousand leagues begin with a single step

TALKIN' ABOUT A REVOLUTION

TRACY CHAPMAN for BERSIH

Poor people gonna rise up
And get their share
Poor people gonna rise up
And take what's theirs

THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE DIGITIZED

KSATRIYA for BERSIH

(Penangite Ksatriya wrote the rap inspired by Gil Scot Heron's The Revolution Will Not Be Televised)
It will not be uploaded to a file share network
There will not be an online poll
Should you be unhappy with services provided
The revolution will change service providers

JUSTICE FOR LGBTS, JUSTICE FOR MALAYSIA

Why is justice so far from those who really need it?

by Pang Khee Teik

“Today I withhold this keris. But if one day I can't tolerate anymore, I will use the keris against the enemy of this land!”

– Speaker at Anti-LGBT Rally, 12 Apr 2012

When the speaker at the Anti-LGBT rally talked about killing whoever he imagined is “the enemy of this land”, and by enemy he implied anyone who advocates for the human rights of LGBTs, the authorities looked the other way. But when Seksualiti Merdeka appealed for understanding, compassion and equality, it was deemed a threat to the national security and was banned by the police.

Have we gotten so used to threats that we are now threatened by compassion? Or could it be that we can no longer tell the difference between those making threats and those upholding the law? Look at what is happening at Dataran Merdeka this week. By brute force, the authorities have attempted to subdue those who dare to question their authority. If that fails, they will try to snuff out our hope for change by applying administrative terrorism.

It’s not just the police and the DBKL. I’m afraid the courts are no better. Seksualiti Merdeka’s judicial review of the ban was thrown out by a judge who insisted that the police’s power cannot be reviewed, effectively allowing the police a caveat to abuse its power unchallenged.

Last week, a teenager was charged for assaulting a Mak Nyah with a metal rod.  He was fined a mere RM400. Meanwhile, when Mak Nyahs around the country are arrested under Syariah offences for expressing themselves and not hurting anybody, they are fined RM1000 each and sent for counselling. We try to rehabilitate these Mak Nyahs for being too gentle, but these men who are so insecure about their masculinity they need to prove it through violence, we let them out to play after a smack on the hand.

So, at the forum titled “Homosexuality: A right or a crime?” at International Islamic University Malaysia two weeks ago, when the question was posed by an audience, “Aren’t the laws we already have enough to protect the LGBTs? We have laws for murder, for physical assault, for wrongful termination at work, etc. Are they not enough?” I can say, the answer is no.

In this article, I am less interested in what JMM said than in how they get away with what they say. I am interested in how the government of the day, which is supposed to be neutral, takes the side of the bullies against the bullied.

With bullies running the country, many LGBTs find themselves hiding further and further beyond the margins of the legal, beyond the reach of the laws that deem them unfit for society. Making a person think he deserves no justice is NO different from denying him justice. And that is how many LGBTs are denied one of the most fundamental rights of being human: the right to justice.

THE POWER OF LGBT VOTES IN MALAYSIA

Around the world, LGBTs represent around 3 to 10 percent of the population. Malaysian homo sapiens are not more homo than average. So it is certainly not 30 percent here as recently claimed by a counsellor in Utusan. This counsellor said his data is solid because he heard it from his gay clients who are being cured of gayness by him. This is what happens when people have a simplistic understanding about the world. This is how our education has failed us.

The Ministry of Education is not the only institution that has failed us. All other Ministries, either in promoting discrimination and misunderstanding of LGBTs or keeping silent when we are discriminated, have also failed us. But the country has not only failed the LGBTs. It has failed all minorities. This government has only been manipulating and pandering to the majority because it is interested in their votes. This is where they are wrong.

The upcoming General Elections will be a close fight. In many constituencies, the difference between the winning candidate and the losing candidate will be about 3 to 10 percent of the votes, the same percentage of LGBTs in society. LGBT voters therefore make up that difference between winning and losing. With the majority split half and half to either coalition, the fate of this election lies in the fabulous hands of the minorities.

DEAR UNITED NATIONS, LGBT IDENTITIES ARE NOT SO UNIVERSAL

I wrote this essay in response to a question for my application for MA in Gender, Sexuality & Culture at Birkbeck College, London. "Please select a short image or article that has appeared in the media during the last week.  Write a commentary of about 500 words on the piece you have selected exploring the ideas/ideologies of gender or sexuality that it reproduces or challenges." It is supposed to be a short essay, so there isn't much room for providing more illustrations to the dense exposition, or making it sound less wanky – though I have since spurted out a few extra drops of thoughts here and there to clarify things. Even if I don't get in, at least I could say I enjoyed this bit of academic masturbation.

The limitations of UN Human Rights Council’s protection of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals

ESSAY for Birkbeck College, London

by Pang Khee Teik

4 April 2012

“To those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, let me say: You are not alone. Your struggle for an end to violence and discrimination is a shared struggle. Any attack on you is an attack on the universal values of the United Nations that I have sworn to defend and uphold. Today, I stand with you and I call upon all countries and people to stand with you, too.” – UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon, 7 Mar 2012

The UN route may have worked in shaming many mature democracies towards amendment of laws and policies to improve legal systems which already protect human rights within their constitutions. But what effect has it on regimes built upon cultural justifications for systemic disregard of human rights? Shaming of non-compliant nations has only resulted in a heightened sense of persecution from the governments of those countries. And unfortunately, this sense of persecution from outsiders is often acted out with further persecution upon vulnerable citizens within those countries.

In addressing lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) worldwide, the UN is in danger of being perceived to reproduce LGBT identities as universal and uniform identities (reference attached below). What does UN mean when it says lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender?

Are these biological categories of human beings? Are these defined based on performative roles of individuals when they express their sexual orientation and gender identity? Who is left out? And most importantly, how can LGBTs, whether they identify as such or not, use this human rights instrument?

In many cultures, individuals who may have been in same-sex relations but who eventually conform to socially sanctioned roles – marriage to opposite sex – cease to identify as LGBTs and can become themselves agents in homophobic campaigns. Does the UN protect and oppose them at the same time? Or, more to the point, protect them from themselves? (Have we come to that again?)

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender, when seen as biologically deterministic terms are perhaps too essentialist. Calling these identities “gay” and “lesbian” as opposed to “homosexuals” may be a move to dissociate from early medical nomenclatures of identities based on sexual behaviour, ie, biological determinism, towards one of identitarian politics, empowered with personal agency.

“Gay” and “lesbian”, burdened as such with political and cultural import, then become vulnerable to rejection from locales where political structures are premised upon cultural purity rhetoric. I am interested to see if performances of gayness, lesbianness, bisexuality and transgenderism within each locality include both expressions (for eg. fashion, language, ways of coming out, etc) that are part of the gay lingua franca as well as localised expressions, and whether these points of syncretisation are instructive in how they produce both the source of conflict as well as resolution.

Another problem is the sharing of sexual orientation and gender identity within the same human rights platform. Separating sexual orientation and gender identity into two sets of categories has astutely revealed both terms to be mutually exclusive to a degree: gender identity does not determine sexual orientation. Placing gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender under the same political platform then is merely a convenient way to combat patriarchy and heteronormativity. And this has limitations.

"WHAT DO YOU REALLY WANT, PANG?"

BFM's Sharaad Kuttan speaks with Pang Khee Teik, Sexuality Rights Activist about the state of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community in Malaysia. Recently, Seksualiti Merdeka was banned and many wondered if the ban had anything to do with Dato' Ambiga Sreenevasan being invited to officiate the festival.

Gay life continues here despite existing restrictions. Therefore, many Malaysian's don't get what the fuss is about between the LGBT community and the government. In this video, Pang Khee Teik explains why the LGBT community NEEDS to be heard and what will happen if basic human rights are not given/taken away from a minority group... just like the LGBT community.

Here's the podcast to an interview conducted with Pang Khee Teik on 'Current Affairs' on BFM 89.9: http://www.bfm.my/current-affairs-091111-pang-khee-teik-seksualiti-merdeka-ban

LGBT: WE DON’T HAVE TO LIVE IN FEAR

A message for LGBTs who say Seksualiti Merdeka is making things worse

Someone wrote to me that: "According to many of my friends, they were doing just fine getting around under the radar until Seksualiti Merdeka 'decided' to fight for LGBT rights publicly. Now they blame Seksualiti Merdeka and its organisers for the scrutiny that they are being put through."

This is my response.

Your fears are real. I have been there before. Always thinking twice for everything I did in case I get caught. At home, I was careful of calls I received. At work, I was careful of emails. I deleted all chats and online histories. After looking over my shoulders to be doubly triply sure no one was looking, I might have some relieve. I had to lie all the time. I had to get out of sight just for some human touch, I had to hide my love. And I feared that these few precious moments would be gone should people find out. So I maintained my silence. And with my silence, I surrendered my dignity.

But not anymore. That is why I can tell you this. It doesn’t have to be this way.

When we chose to trade in our dignity for the privilege of being left alone we will always think that this privilege is all we are worth. We live under the radar because we think under the radar is where we belong. We forget that life is for living, not for existing in the shadows.

We pay for these privileges with our silence, and this silence, while pleasant in times of innocence will render us unable to speak for ourselves in times of injustice.

This silence is what feeds the beast of oppression. While we live silently, those less able than us to hide will become victims at the jaws of the beast. You and I feed the beast when we chose to keep silent about injustice faced by others. We may be lucky to escape, but not everyone is that lucky.

LGBT children are kicked out of their homes, with nowhere to go they often end up selling themselves, for the privilege to survive. Transgender individuals are denied work, they are beaten up, sometimes by vigilantes, sometimes by religious officers, sometimes by police. All they want is the privilege to walk down the street without getting beaten up. LGBTs continue to be easy target for sexual abuse and are made to feel like it is their fault, so they never report it and they are denied the privilege of justice. Gay professionals from teachers to engineers to police are blackmailed at work, so they pay up to avoid being exposed, to keep that privilege to work. All around, many LGBTs, out of their love for their families, force themselves to separate from the ones they truly love and marry someone they don't, buying a lifetime of silence for the privilege of not being kicked out from the family. When all these privileges add up to zero, many young LGBTs attempt suicide as they contemplate a life without happiness and meaning. How many of us must suffer this way before we finally realise that our silence has allowed their continued suffering?

同志們，千萬別生活在恐懼中

這篇文章是寫給那些說『性向自主』使情勢變得更糟的LGBT們。
原作者：馮啟德 | 譯者：明越、欣怡

有人寫信告訴我：“我好多朋友都表示，在性向自主決定要高調地為LGBT發聲前，原本他們都可以低調地過著好日子。現在他們動輒被提出來審視，都是因為性向自主跟組織成員們害的。”

我的回應如下：

你的恐懼是真實的。我以前也是那樣，每次做事都要三思以免被抓。在家裡，接個電話都要小心翼翼。在工作上，收發信件也是一樣，我得清除所有聊天與上網的記錄。

總得要一而再三地確定沒有人在窺視，我才可能稍微鬆一口氣。我成天都得說謊。我想稍微親熱一點的時候得謹慎避開眾人的目光，我必須要隱藏我的愛，我害怕一被人發現，那些寶貴的時刻會離我而去。所以我保持沉默，而保持沉默使我放棄了身為人的尊嚴。

但現在不是了，所以我可以告訴你，沒有必要這樣子。

當我們選擇犧牲尊嚴來交換所謂不被騷擾、低調平靜的權利時，便會誤以為我們的人生僅值得這些。我們以為這一輩子就注定只能躲躲藏藏。我們忘記了生命的價值在於生活，而非躲起來不見天日。

我們保持沉默以維持這些『權利』，保持沉默或許讓我們在天下太平的時候過得悠哉悠哉，卻讓我們在不公不義的時刻無法為自己發聲。

有一隻怪獸叫『壓迫』，我們的沉默就是它得以生存的食物。當我們選擇安安靜靜地過日子的時候，那些比較無力保護自己的人成了它爪牙下的受害者。當其他人面對不公不義的時候，我們的沉默是它的幫兇。也許我們很慶幸可以逃開，但並非每個人都是那麼地幸運。